Boards to discuss Hârn, HârnWorld, HârnMaster, and RPGs in general.
Links - Home - Kelestia Productions - Columbia Games Inc
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 1:44 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:23 am 
Offline
Reeve
Reeve
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 8:36 am
Posts: 366
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Thank you Harniac for a rational, well-conceived roadmap.

This kind of comment is much more constructive and positive than all of the spiteful NRC/CGI bashing that this forum is starting to turn towards.

I do not believe that Harn will survive if it ceases to be a commercial entity. Fandom, while excellent and in abundance, is not sufficuent to maintain or grow the existing audience. I hope that Robin and CGI can use ideas such as this one as a foundation for coming to a new agreement.

Cheers,
Brian

_________________
Brian McNeilly
Burnaby BC Canada
bmcneilly@shaw.ca
http://members.shaw.ca/harngm/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 8:56 pm
Posts: 3424
Location: AU, ACT, Canberra
I was asked to arbitrate this dispute a few months after the initial termination, but refused for several reasons. (1) I live in Australia, the dispute exists in the Pacific Northwest of North America. (2) I'm not a law professional; while I have done several university-level law subjects, the majority of my training has been in Australian law. (3) I wasn't convinced that I would find a resolution, based on the—admittedly informal level of—information I had at the time from both parties.

However, I'd be willing to play my part in The Hârniac's Roadmap, if asked by the disputees (both CGI and NRC).

_________________
Cheers

Leitchy
List & Forum Admin
Admin FAQs
[Updated 25-FEB-2011]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:47 pm 
Offline
Reeve
Reeve
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:26 am
Posts: 481
Location: Visalia, CA
Rothesay wrote:
I don't know much about the OGL issues as I don't play D20 etc., but it seems to me there would be some parties right off who would be interested in Harn: Steve Jackson/GURPS and the newly reconstituted ICE. No doubt there are others, but I'd expect the mere addition of a module or two from such sources to expand the Harnic base, possibily dramatically.


With how many on this forum that have played or do play ( :D ) Rolemaster, and the number of people on the ICE forum that have played in Harn, that would definately be a possibility. Maybe through the Guild Companion?

_________________
"The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armor of light."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:10 am 
Offline
Villein
Villein
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 61
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
I respect whatever decision you make Leitchy and I appreciate you stepping up and saying you'd accept that role if they asked. I don't know that it is a disadvantage on balance that you are not in the country, it might even help in avoiding any impression of bias. Further, with the Internet and Google I am sure you'd be able to quickly find ample arbitration firms and law firms that could do the job. If someone wants to nominate someone else too, that's great. But I think the next step is to make sure that we know that CGI and Robin are aware of this roadmap - unless there's a desire to alter it first?

If not, I'd be happy to email it with a delivery receipt and then the ball is in their court and that of public opinion (pun intended...).

_________________
Björn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Mediation
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:12 am 
Offline
Creator
Creator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2002 12:52 pm
Posts: 86
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Leitchy wrote:
I was asked to arbitrate this dispute a few months after the initial termination, but refused for several reasons. (1) I live in Australia, the dispute exists in the Pacific Northwest of North America. (2) I'm not a law professional; while I have done several university-level law subjects, the majority of my training has been in Australian law. (3) I wasn't convinced that I would find a resolution, based on the—admittedly informal level of—information I had at the time from both parties.

However, I'd be willing to play my part in The Hârniac's Roadmap, if asked by the disputees (both CGI and NRC).


Mediation might possibly work. I, therefore, propose the following:

(1) Peter contact both parties and offers mediation.
(2) This forum be deleted and further public discussion of the dispute be halted.
(3) Peter solicits and receives whatever information he needs from both parties.
(4) Mediation happens.
(5a) Peter reports back to the HarnForum as to why a settlement could not be reached OR;
(5b) Peter and the parties jointly announce a new settlement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:04 am 
Offline
Knight
Knight
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2002 2:08 pm
Posts: 1179
How about:

1) Keep it private and do not involve the fan base or the public court of appeal
2) Not delete the threads that you yourself started by inflaming people and being accusatory. I can not accept an attempt to dissolve yourself of any blame for the turn of events on the forum. But it’s all of your doing. Your hubris in actuality.

3) Issue an apology to the general Harn fan base and not those few that you deem worthy of an apology because you value their contribution as superior to others. Your apology was not acceptable or sincere and you show no concern for those, like myself, who have quietly purchased and followed your works for 20+ years.
I am sorry I am not enough of a plodding sycophant to warrant your respect or apology and that is a pity for you.

3a) Open letter apology to the Harn community in general for drawing then into a personal dispute that is truly between you and CGI.
3b) An open letter of apology to all that you do not think we are thieves, liars and accountable to fraud ( that is libel by the way).


Since I doubt you will even acknowledge this post as I am not worthwhile to you. I will publicly state I will never purchase another product of yours or support you in any way until you at least fulfill issue 3 fully.

The best way to grow obsolete, or cease to exist is to have an ever increasing share of a shrinking market.

Until that time I will vote in the forum of public opinion by giving my money only to CGI until such time as you show concern for my money and interest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mediation
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:25 am 
Offline
Knight
Knight
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:40 pm
Posts: 1540
Location: California
Robin wrote:
Mediation might possibly work. I, therefore, propose the following:


Warning: lunch-spoiling imagery ahead!

Did lancing this festering boil help? I think this post is a sign that we're getting near the end of the pus. Hopefully there's not too much left. I'm still expecting one last glob of nastiness before we slap a bandage on it though.

_________________
Cyril laugh at puny human!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mediation
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:42 am 
Offline
Reeve
Reeve
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 8:36 am
Posts: 366
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Brandybuck wrote:
Warning: lunch-spoiling imagery ahead!


Ug. I read this right in the middle of fettucine alfredo :(

I do agree with the hope that this is over soon.

_________________
Brian McNeilly
Burnaby BC Canada
bmcneilly@shaw.ca
http://members.shaw.ca/harngm/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mediation
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:53 am 
Offline
Baron
Baron
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 4332
Location: Boston, MA
Brénan-al-Saél wrote:
Ug. I read this right in the middle of fettucine alfredo :(

I hope your keyboard is ok. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mediation
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:05 am 
Offline
Reeve
Reeve
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 8:36 am
Posts: 366
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Rothesay wrote:
Brénan-al-Saél wrote:
Ug. I read this right in the middle of fettucine alfredo :(

I hope your keyboard is ok. :?


Keyboard is OK, but the last half of my lunch was a *lot* less appetizing. ;)

_________________
Brian McNeilly
Burnaby BC Canada
bmcneilly@shaw.ca
http://members.shaw.ca/harngm/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:07 am 
Offline
Villein
Villein
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 61
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Far be it from me to try to dictate this process but I see a couple of pitfalls with Robin's proposal:

It puts, somewhat unfairly, I think, a very heavy burden on Peter. And it does not appear to have very sharp legal teeth - although I am sure any agreement would carry a lot of weight in this community. It has the advantage of being cheap and "easy" though. If it is more feasible this way than the way I suggested above, and therefore will happen, I am in favor of this very much as opposed to the status quo.

Those are my thoughts, I am open to being convinced otherwise.

_________________
Björn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:32 am 
Offline
Cottar
Cottar

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:28 am
Posts: 11
Yes, while Harniac's proposal is a very good one, I think it is extremely unfair to Peter. Further, unless it is ameanable to both sides, I think it is unlikely to be fruitful. A written agreement is certainly necessary, and the terms and conditions would need to be hammered out. That will be a very painful process as the mediator would need to dig through a lot of emotional baggage and pain on the part of both parties. (Not unique to this business problem... that kind of thing always happens when you have disputes like this. Rarely are the issues legal or even business related as much as they are personal and emotional.)

If both sides could get past this with Peter as mediator, he should be nominated for saint-hood.

Alas, gone are the days when dueling with swords or pistols would be preferred method for two gentlemen to settle their disputes....

Of course it's the way of those who sail under the jolly roger to put all gentlemen to the blade...

Yours in digital piracy
Nom de Plume

_________________
A war-ferret on both your houses...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:48 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 8:56 pm
Posts: 3424
Location: AU, ACT, Canberra
No saint, I. :)

I wouldn't/couldn't mediate myself, for the reasons I've already pointed out. I was volunteering for the role that Harniac spelled out for me, and that is to FIND an arbitrator that is mutually agreeable, and has the applicable legal knowledge, to carry out the mediation.

One problem I can see from this is the cost of the arbitrator; it would have to be borne by CGI and NRC equally. I certainly don't have the funds to sort out someone else's legal problems.

_________________
Cheers

Leitchy
List & Forum Admin
Admin FAQs
[Updated 25-FEB-2011]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:46 pm 
Offline
Villein
Villein
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 61
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
I agree a 100% with you Leitchy. That was my basic idea, that you could help get the process started etc, but to place the mediation burden on you does not make much sense on any level. So back to CGI and NRC, why not use the roadmap orginally proposed?

Doing some fast and loose estimates, assuming 1,000 people spend $50/year on average on Harn, and a 50/50 split between CGI/NRC the income is "only" $25K/year. So I can see where several thousand dollars is a very big deal.

Would it be helpful if some more exact research into the price of this was done? The numbers for lawyers I quoted earlier I just made up, although based on my experience as a business owner they should be in the ballpark.

My opinion is that unless it is done the basic way I proposed (within the general realm of assuming an arbitrated solution should happen) I doubt any agreement will happen or much less stick.

That said, I don't really care about a roadmap, I care about Harn and any solution that keeps this community thriving and strong has my vote.

_________________
Björn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:01 am 
Offline
Yeoman
Yeoman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2002 12:50 am
Posts: 630
Location: Boise, Idaho
Hârniac wrote:
That said, I don't really care about a roadmap, I care about Harn and any solution that keeps this community thriving and strong has my vote.


Agreed!

_________________
Hawk

Harn Website: http://www.boiseharn.us/

"Oh bother," said the Borg, "We've assimilated Pooh."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group